Home  |  Korean  |  Sitemap 

About us

Services

Information

Ip News

Q & A

Contact Us

Links

 

Path : Information > IP Laws > Design > ChapVI

Patent   |  Utility model   |  Design   |  Trademark

 

  CHAPTER VI PROTECTION OF OWNER OF DESIGN RIGHT  

 

Article 62 ¡¼Injunction Against Infringement, etc.¡½  

(1) An owner of a design right or exclusive licensee may request a person who is infringing or

is likely to infringe on his rights to discontinue or refrain from such infringement.

(2) An owner of a design right or an exclusive licensee who is acting under paragraph (1)

may demand the destruction of the articles which resulted from the act of infringement, the

removal of the facilities used for the act of infringement, or other measures necessary to

prevent the infringement.  

 

Article 63 ¡¼Acts Deemed to be Infringing¡½  

Acts of commercially or industrially working articles used exclusively for the manufacture of

articles to which a registered design or similar design is applied shall be deemed to be an

infringement of the design right or exclusive license.

 

Article 64 ¡¼Presumption, etc., of Amount of Damage¡½  

(1) Where the owner of a design right or exclusive licensee claims compensation for

damages from a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed a design right or

exclusive license, the profits gained by the infringer as a result of the infringement shall be

presumed to be the amount of damage suffered by the owner of the design right or exclusive

licensee.  

(2) An owner of a design right or exclusive licensee may claim as damages, the amount of

money which he would normally be entitled to receive for the working of the registered design

from the person who has intentionally or negligently infringed the design right or exclusive

license, as the amount of damages suffered by him by the infringement.  

(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), where the amount of damages exceed the amount

referred to in paragraph(2), the amount in excess may also be claimed as compensation for

damages. In such a case, the court may take into consideration the fact that there has been

neither willfulness nor gross negligence on the part of the person who has infringed the

design right or the exclusive license when awarding damages.

 

Article 65 ¡¼Presumption of Negligence¡½  

(1) A person who has infringed a design right or exclusive license of another person shall be

presumed to have been negligent regarding such act of infringement.. However, this provision

shall not apply to the infringement of a design right or exclusive license relating to a design

registered as a secret design under Article 13(1).

(2) The provision of paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person

having a design right under registration of unexamined design infringes another person's

design right or exclusive license.  

Article 66 ¡¼Measures for Recovery of Reputation of Owner of Design Right, etc.¡½  

Upon the request of an owner of a design right or exclusive licensee, the court may, in lieu of

damages or in addition thereto, order the person who has injured the business reputation of

the owner of a design right or exclusive licensee by intentionally or negligently infringing the

design right or exclusive license, to take necessary measures to restore the business

reputation of the said owner or exclusive licensee.  

 

Article 67 ¡¼Mutatis Mutandis Application of Provisions of the Patent Law¡½  

The provisions of Article 132 of the Patent Law shall apply mutatis mutandis to the

protection of the owner of a design right.

 

 

 

Copyright 2001 M.S.PARK & ASSOCIATES All rights reserved.
Mail to Webmaster.   Tel :+82-2-553-5777  Fax :+82-2-553-5250